What is the Difference Between Asset Management Fees And Private Equity Management Fees ?
Explanation
Why Private Equity Management Fees Are Higher Than Traditional Asset Management Fees
When comparing private equity (PE) management fees to those charged by traditional public market asset managers (such as balanced mandates), it’s important to understand the differences in complexity, effort, and transparency between the two investment environments.
Greater Complexity in Private Markets
Investing in unlisted companies requires a significantly more labour-intensive approach. Private equity managers must work hard to identify, access, and analyse investment opportunities—often without the benefit of public data.
In contrast, traditional asset managers who invest in listed equities or bonds operate in a much more transparent environment, where companies are required to:
- Publish audited financial statements
- Announce material events to the public via stock exchange filings
- Maintain minutes and disclosures that are publicly accessible
These disclosures help reduce information asymmetry and allow public market investors to make informed decisions more efficiently. In addition, public securities benefit from daily price discovery and liquidity, which enables investors to enter and exit positions with ease.
Private Equity Managers Operate Without Public Market Advantages
In the private markets, none of these advantages exist. Private equity managers must:
- Source deals through relationships and market insight
- Negotiate directly with company owners or stakeholders
- Use their own judgment to assess valuation and risk
- Manage and improve portfolio companies before executing a suitable exit
There is no public marketplace for price discovery, and liquidity events (exits) are rare and complex—often requiring years of value creation before the investment can be realised.
Why Fees Are Higher in Private Equity
Due to the intensive effort required in deal sourcing, due diligence, active ownership, and exit planning, private equity fees are naturally higher than those charged by public market managers.
For this reason, trustees and institutional investors must understand that higher fees in private equity reflect the active nature of the strategy, the illiquidity premium, and the depth of engagement required to generate returns in a private market context.
View More Definitions & Explanations
The Origins and Evolution of Private Equity
Private equity (PE) has grown into a global financial powerhouse, but its beginnings can be traced back to the post-World War II era. The formation of the American Research and Development Corporation (ARDC) in 1946 marked one of the earliest institutional private equity efforts.
ARDC’s mission was to fund companies that could repurpose wartime technologies for commercial use. One of its landmark investments was in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC). A modest $70,000 investment in DEC eventually turned into $355 million, delivering a return of over 5,000 times the original amount. This staggering success demonstrated the potential of private equity to fuel innovation and drive extraordinary financial outcomes.
The Rise of Leveraged Buyouts in the 1980s
The 1980s became a transformative decade for private equity, largely due to the emergence of leveraged buyouts (LBOs). Pioneering firms such as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) led this movement, acquiring companies primarily through borrowed capital, implementing operational improvements, and exiting through strategic sales or IPOs. These deals often resulted in significant returns and played a key role in legitimizing private equity as a powerful tool for value creation.
Private Equity Today: A Global Asset Class
Fast-forward to today, and private equity has evolved into a multi-trillion-dollar global industry. PE firms are actively involved in reshaping key sectors, including technology, healthcare, financial services, energy, and consumer goods. The United States continues to dominate the market, but institutional investors are increasingly turning their attention to opportunities in Europe and Asia where valuations are more attractive and growth potential remains robust.
In recent years, PE has also embraced thematic and impact investing. Many funds are aligning their strategies with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles or specific global trends, such as digital transformation, renewable energy, and health innovation. This not only broadens investor appeal but also enhances the sector’s influence on global progress.
The Dominance of Private Companies
One compelling statistic underscores the importance of private markets: approximately 83% of U.S. companies with over $100 million in revenue remain privately held. This highlights the vital role of private equity in financing, developing, and scaling enterprises outside the public markets.
In summary, private equity has evolved from a niche investment strategy to a dominant force in global finance. With its origins in innovation and a future driven by strategic investment, operational excellence, and global diversification, PE is positioned to remain a key player in shaping tomorrow’s economy.
